Return to Main

Join email List | Appearance Schedule | Bookstore | Publications | Contact Us 

Last Updated: Jan 26th, 2013 - 21:14:33 

               Get Your Signed Copy!

Front Page 
Op Eds
     Reviews of Books
     Future Jihad Web Site
     The War of Ideas Web Site
     The Confrontation
     The Coming Revolution
     Lost Spring Site
Printed Media
Walid Phares Blog
Phares in Spanish
Phares in French
Phares in Arabic
     Florida Atlantic University Teaching
     Lifelong Learning Society Teaching
Slavic Media
Romney for President 2012


Phares on Benghazi hearings: "Did Washington consider the Salafi militias allies or foes?”
By editor
Jan 24, 2013, 00:16

Email this article
 Printer friendly page
Zawahiri and Benghazi

Commenting on the U.S. Congressional hearings on Benghazi, particularly the hearing sessions with Secretary Hilary Clinton, Dr. Walid Phares said the central question was and will continue to be: “How did the Administration perceive the Salafi militias operating in Benghazi, and in Libya in general?" The answer to that question would determine the resolutions to the most important issues broached in this hearing. Phares, a congressional advisor and the author of The Coming Revolution: Struggle for Freedom in the Middle East, asserted, "If Washington considered the Salafist militias, and Ansar al Sharia was one of them, as partners in the fight against Gaddafi, then the readiness U.S. missions had towards engaging these militias would have been understandably low. But if the Administration considered these militias, many of which had ties to al Qaeda, as threats to the U.S., then the level of readiness was poor." Phares, who advised Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney on the Middle East, also argued that "tactical and local security considerations can be understood and analyzed only in the context of a larger threat situation. There is a disconnect that has not yet been addressed: the Administration worked with these Jihadi militias in one form or another. These forces were not on the map as a threat to U.S. national security because of a political determination that said forces were on the right side of history, and they were perceived as crucial in the transition to integration. Congress and special investigation committees ought to focus on this central issue and apparent disconnect first. Only after this posture is explained can one even begin to understand the implications of the rest of the questions."

© Copyright 2003 by

Top of Page

Recent Headlines
Phares to al Arabiya: "Liberate a Sunni area in Iraq and let it grow against the Islamic State"